Timothy Chen

Marco’s article on Bullshit

Apple:

  • This web app or social network we’re making is going to be great.
  • Our app-review rules are always in everyone’s best interests.
  • Nobody wants a [popular new product category that Apple doesn’t make yet].

Google:

  • Android is open.
  • Don’t be evil.
  • We solicit all of your personal information and track everything you do to make things better for you.

Facebook:

  • Our users want to interact with brands.
  • We value your privacy.
  • We’re not tracking you when you’re logged out.

Everyone has their bullshit. You can simply decide whose you’re willing to tolerate.

Why I need an iPad for Christmas - a plea by Brian to his wife

Why I need an iPad for Christmas - a plea by Brian to his wife

To #OWS - List out your demands!

I understand the motivation between the Occupy Wall Street movement. I am all for it. However, I don’t think it is enough. To me it looks like a bunch of angry people , camping out and not knowing what they want. I’ve heard their message loud and clear. I understand their anger because it is the same as mine. I think the OWS people needs to list out their demands item by item so the US government has a checklist to go by. If people think our elected officers or the greedy bastards at Wall Street are going to come back with a plan to set the path straight, then we are smoking crack. It isn’t going to happen. They will give us these vague promises. They will tell us of the bogus theory of being “too big to fail”. They will continue to kick the can down the street; they did it in 2008 and they can do it again. Here are some broad demands off the top of my head:

1. Cap executive compensation at Wall Street

2. Make executives criminally liable for the decisions they make. Or have claw-back provisions where these execs have to return money back to the government personally if they don’t perform and where firms have to do so for a period of time

3. Impose a larger tax on institutions who don’t hold to their position on stocks on less than two years to encourage long term investments

I would read this post by Mark Cuban in blogmaverick and use that as a template for a demand list.  Otherwise we will see these greedy bankers flying off in their private jets looking down below at a bunch of OWS protests that have demanded nothing & mock us behind their backs.

Jesus & Social Networks

The spread of Christianity in the last two thousand years is filled with marketing innovation. In fact if you really think about it, Jesus Christ was one of the first people to introduce direct marketing to the world. Two thousand and four hundred years ago, direct marketing of Christianity was a groundbreaking approach to spreading religion. Here was a carpenter that was able to create a “virale marketing” phenomena by gathering 12 disciples and asking them to go and spread the good news of God through different parts of the world. Prior to Jesus Christ, religion was inclusive to a certain race, certain geography, or a certain class of society. Jesus Christ took a grass roots direct marketing approach and used fishermen, tax collectors, basically the average Joe off the street and asked them to take it the people. The model of the home family church thrived and exponentially grew despite the persecution of Christians by the Roman Empire. 

Another growth spurt for Christianity was the invention of the Guggenheim press. Prior to the invention of the Guggenheim press, books were laboriously hand written and copied. The Guggenheim press changed all that, as books now could be mass-produced cheaply and in volume. It was a technology breakthrough that allowed the 1st book in the Guggenheim press, the Bible, to be mass produced in volume and delivered to the illiterate masses. The illiterate peasant now could have a Bible to learn English, bridge the “knowledge” divide, and empower themselves with knowledge. Not only that but the stories of our benevolent God was plastered in every page of this school book, the Bible. Inherently the “have-nots” of the Western civilization were converted to Christianity concurrent with the rise of literacy.  

 

So what has happened with the growth of Christianity today? If you look at the United States today there are about 159 million people that call themselves Christians. The growth of Christians is growing about 2% per year which is roughly equivalent to the growth of the US population. Christianity in first world countries, especially in the youth groups, has slowed to a halt. My generation feeds off of twitter, Facebook and Zynga. Christianity is still the largest religion in the world with growth spurts in emerging markets areas such as China, Latin America, and Korea. Dr. Cho Yongchi and his Yoido Full Gospel Church have pioneered the cell group model to ministry amassing whopping 1 million members in his congregation. This is an approach that a number of Christians are adapting and succeeding. At its core the cell group approach uses a network topology for a multiplier effect. The growth and spread of Christianity in a cell group approach is exponential. 

 

 So let me leave you further room for thought by quoting an excerpt from Albert-Laszlo Barabasi, the nation’s foremost expert in the new science of networks, in his book “Linked”

 

“The early Christian were nothing more than a renegade Jewish Sect. Regarded as eccentric and problematic, they were persecuted by both Jewish and Roman authorities … Christianity, like many other religious movements in human history, seemed doomed to oblivion. Despite the odds, close to two billion people call themselves Christians today. How did that happen? How did the unorthodox beliefs of a small and disdained Jewish sect come to form the basis of the Western world’s dominant religion? … But credit for the success of Christianity in fact goes to an orthodox an pious Jew who never met Jesus. While his Hebrew name was Saul, he is better known to us by his Roman name, Paul. Paul’s life was to curb Christianity. He traveled from community to community persecuting Christians because they put Jesus, condemned by the authorities as a blasphemer, on the same level as God … Nevertheless, according to historical accounts, this fierce persecutor of Christian underwent a sudden conversion in the year 34 and became the fiercest supporter of the new faith …. How did Paul’s efforts succeed? The message had to spread. So he used his firsthand knowledge of the social network of the first century’s civilized world from Rome to Jerusalem to reach and convert as many as he could. He walked nearly 10,000 miles in the next twelve years of his life. He did not wander randomly, however, he reached out to the biggest communities of his era, to the people and places in which the faith could germinate and spread most effectively. He was the first and by far the most effective salesperson of Christianity, using theology and social networks equally effectively. Could it happen again? “

 Jesus and Paul were the first true virale marketers. They were the first to create a social network, a network where everyone was equal & was used for social upheaval. FaceBook is a digital variant of what Jesus pioneered thousand of years ago. I believe in the future someone will create a religion built on the top of a platform like Facebook - the world’s first SNS religion.  Could it be Zuck that does this? Zuck is like Jesus, they are both Jewish and they both walk around in sandals?

 

Why I am running a marathon

When I was in high school I had a hard time running even one mile. I think my best time was a 13 min mile; pathetic by all standards. So I always wanted to run a marathon regardless of time; to prove to myself that I can do something that my body wouldn’t allow, to will myself to the finish line. It was like my equivalent of going to the moon. 

But it was only when I got fat, did I seriously take up training for a marathon. I used to be really skinny as a kid. When I hit 27, my metabolism just slowed down. I even became lactose tolerant. I was 63kg in college. When I was 28, I ballooned up to 87kg, so I decided to run. I ran for a couple of months, dropped to 72 kg, got sick because I burned myself out and let my goal of running a marathon fall to the way side. Now at 37, I am back at again. This time with a lot more discipline. I’ve been jogging for over 6 months now. 

This time the running is different. It isn’t just about doing something my body can’t do. I like to think I gained more endurance. But what I like about running is the alone time. I like it when sweat beads out of my head. When I run, I feel that my head gets cleared out. I can think more clearly. I pray. I reflect.  I can take an emotion like anger and chip away at it so that it disappears.  I am alone; running and meditating at the same time. So why do I want to run marathon now? I think it will be a spiritual experience; for my spirit, my body and the road ahead of me. 

Intel - The True Shanzai King

I read an article linked by Sean  in regards to Intel’s initiative into Ultrabooks. It then hit me. Intel is the King of Shanzai. What is the Ultrabook but Intel’s initiative to push PC companies to shamelessly copy Apple’s MacBook Air? What are Asus and Acer’s UltraBook  but poor man copies of the MacBook Air?

Intel rose to market domination in the 80s by promoting IBM PC clones. Mediatek grew rapidly this last decade by promoting Nokia knockoffs and enabling so called pioneering turnkey solutions. I like to argue that these MTK turnkey solutions are not pioneering.  Wintel is a turnkey solution between Microsoft and Intel.  Taiwan in the 80s was to cheap PCs what Shenzhen now is to cheap phones and tablets. Shanzai is but a derogatory name to what really should be termed whitebox. Shanzai is the new white.

Fortunately out of this market, Taiwan innovated and clawed to create a semiconductor industry.  TSMC is a shining example of a mfg company that created the fabless IC model. In our prime, VIA drove memory standards like PC133 and DDR. We were the first to promote UMA and the first to evangelize  the concept of “HW platforms” and low power x86. It’s shameless how Intel used legal forces to squash us in the name of innovation. We crashed and burned.  It  struck fear in the hearts of IC companies in Taiwan. Who else had the courage to lead? Taiwan is now stuck with IC companies that only execute. It’s dangerous. 

Don’t get me wrong. I don’t disagree with imitation. Like Picasso said “good artists copy, great artists steal. ” But that’s not the whole picture. Great masters apprentice under their masters, stand on the shoulders of these giants, and grew from that.   I do disagree with how Intel says one thing and does another. Intel enabling the HW industry? What a crock of shit.Why are Intel’s margin 60 percent and PC companies 5 percent? Intel treats Taiwan as a bunch of system assemblers.  Intel has handicapped Taiwan in our RD capability and fed us new age opium with their marketing dollars.

Intel  Inside? Inside of Intel is the heart of a Shanzai king, the heart of a true bandit. 

The Decision - Why I think Bill Gates is the Bigger Man

I want to write to you about a decision I think is courageous. Note that I am biased.  Even without Bill Gates’ NGO & vaccine stuff,  I think Windows has done more to help society than Apple, way more. If it wasn’t for Microsoft, we wouldn’t have the world of PCs today. We wouldn’t have affordable PCs and we wouldn’t have the proliferation of the IT world as we have today. It’s like if there wasn’t Ford, the proliferation of cars would not have happened. Bill Gates is not sexy. He isn’t at all. I would even go out and say that without Bill Gates, there would be no Apple. People forget that in the late 90s, it was Microsoft that invested into Apple to keep them alive and going. Bill Gates didn’t need to do that. He could have let Apple die. I bet no one in the world would have done that at that time. Apple was months away from going into bankruptcy. But why did he do that? To make the world a better place. Bill knew Steve was great. Bill invested into Steve as a person. Bill Gates invested in a competitor that he knew potentially would come back to haunt him. He invested in a rival that taunted him in the 80s. Not only did he invest in Apple, they continued to do products for Apple.  That’s why to me Bill Gates is the bigger man. He allowed and invested in Steve Jobs to succeed. Money is the life blood of any company and he gave an infusion to Apple when they needed it most. If Steve Jobs was given that choice, what would he have done? He would have done what benefited him the most. Bill Gates saw the end game. I respect Jobs a lot but I find him in many ways to be a petty asshole. I find it amazing that people drink up all the PR fed to us by the media. Bill Gates unimaginative? He created the software industry. He imagined what Jobs could do and still proceeded to invest in him. That’s courage and doing what’s right. That to me is a decision that went beyond himself and his company. He did it to make the world a better place.